mirror of
https://github.com/ansible-collections/community.general.git
synced 2026-05-08 14:22:46 +00:00
Moving result reading to a background thread
This commit is contained in:
43
lib/ansible/executor/action_write_locks.py
Normal file
43
lib/ansible/executor/action_write_locks.py
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
|
||||
# (c) 2016 - Red Hat, Inc. <support@ansible.com>
|
||||
#
|
||||
# This file is part of Ansible
|
||||
#
|
||||
# Ansible is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify
|
||||
# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
|
||||
# the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or
|
||||
# (at your option) any later version.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# Ansible is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
|
||||
# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
|
||||
# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
|
||||
# GNU General Public License for more details.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
|
||||
# along with Ansible. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
|
||||
|
||||
# Make coding more python3-ish
|
||||
from __future__ import (absolute_import, division, print_function)
|
||||
__metaclass__ = type
|
||||
|
||||
from multiprocessing import Lock
|
||||
from ansible.module_utils.facts import Facts
|
||||
|
||||
if 'action_write_locks' not in globals():
|
||||
# Do not initialize this more than once because it seems to bash
|
||||
# the existing one. multiprocessing must be reloading the module
|
||||
# when it forks?
|
||||
action_write_locks = dict()
|
||||
|
||||
# Below is a Lock for use when we weren't expecting a named module.
|
||||
# It gets used when an action plugin directly invokes a module instead
|
||||
# of going through the strategies. Slightly less efficient as all
|
||||
# processes with unexpected module names will wait on this lock
|
||||
action_write_locks[None] = Lock()
|
||||
|
||||
# These plugins are called directly by action plugins (not going through
|
||||
# a strategy). We precreate them here as an optimization
|
||||
mods = set(p['name'] for p in Facts.PKG_MGRS)
|
||||
mods.update(('copy', 'file', 'setup', 'slurp', 'stat'))
|
||||
for mod_name in mods:
|
||||
action_write_locks[mod_name] = Lock()
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ from ansible.module_utils._text import to_bytes, to_text
|
||||
# Must import strategy and use write_locks from there
|
||||
# If we import write_locks directly then we end up binding a
|
||||
# variable to the object and then it never gets updated.
|
||||
from ansible.plugins import strategy
|
||||
from ansible.executor import action_write_locks
|
||||
|
||||
try:
|
||||
from __main__ import display
|
||||
@@ -605,16 +605,16 @@ def _find_snippet_imports(module_name, module_data, module_path, module_args, ta
|
||||
display.debug('ANSIBALLZ: using cached module: %s' % cached_module_filename)
|
||||
zipdata = open(cached_module_filename, 'rb').read()
|
||||
else:
|
||||
if module_name in strategy.action_write_locks:
|
||||
if module_name in action_write_locks.action_write_locks:
|
||||
display.debug('ANSIBALLZ: Using lock for %s' % module_name)
|
||||
lock = strategy.action_write_locks[module_name]
|
||||
lock = action_write_locks.action_write_locks[module_name]
|
||||
else:
|
||||
# If the action plugin directly invokes the module (instead of
|
||||
# going through a strategy) then we don't have a cross-process
|
||||
# Lock specifically for this module. Use the "unexpected
|
||||
# module" lock instead
|
||||
display.debug('ANSIBALLZ: Using generic lock for %s' % module_name)
|
||||
lock = strategy.action_write_locks[None]
|
||||
lock = action_write_locks.action_write_locks[None]
|
||||
|
||||
display.debug('ANSIBALLZ: Acquiring lock')
|
||||
with lock:
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -285,6 +285,7 @@ class TaskQueueManager:
|
||||
for host_name in iterator.get_failed_hosts():
|
||||
self._failed_hosts[host_name] = True
|
||||
|
||||
strategy.cleanup()
|
||||
self._cleanup_processes()
|
||||
return play_return
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user